I’m excited to be included on the Bookworm Carnival hosted by Jessica at bluestockings.com. She posted my
last entry for the Lit Flick challenge on Inkheart. I almost didn’t make it because of my chronic procrastination problem, which you might think I would have worked on more by now. I hadn’t checked her blog for awhile out of guilt because I still have 3 posts to do by Feb 28! Of course, I did start late, but that’s only one excuse
So, with no further babble, let me present #3…and expect 2 more in the next week!

Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day (Persephone Classics) by Winifred Watson
I picked this one up at the library upon the recommendation of my blogger friend Dy, at Dy’s Mind’s Eye, way back in December. I actually started and stopped and renewed and paid late fees, but once I got back into it, it really was a fun, quick read. The plot actually follows the protagonist’s life-changing adventures for one day, and the chapters are in time intervals.
Miss Guinivere Pettigrew is an average woman who has little pleasure in life, working unsuccessfully as a governess and choosing to watch other people enjoy life in high-society and on film. In one day, she makes a series of choices that completely change her life. Though a lot of the plot centers on parties and romance, there really are underlying themes about women’s roles, society’s mores, and joie de vivre. It is the kind of book that can actually inspire one to look at life a little differently. The simplistic view is that life can be fun, but not if you live it according to other people’s expectations. We should make our own choices and enjoy it. Though it is from another era, the story is timeless.
First of all, I love finding new-to-me books by unsung writers from literary history. A lot of women writers especially,
like Winifred Watson, from past generations have been forgotten or ignored, though some groups and companies like Persephone Books are remedying that by reissuing books and reintroducing them to the world. They republished this book in 2000, two years before the author passed away. I hope she got some sense of closure in her life, rather than being completely forgotten [for fellow writers this may give us added hope too! It's never too late to be discovered!] Reading the biography included in the new edition was an extra bonus, to learn about Ms. Watson. She wrote a few books, and did enjoy recognition in her lifetime, but completely stopped writing after becoming a mother…[!]…Knowing how hard it is to juggle mommyhood with work/house/life and add writing to the mix, I can only imagine how Ms. Watson came to such a decision. She is quoted as saying “You cannot write when you are never alone.” How well I know the feeling. She also had tragedies from WWII to contend with and I am sure that there was some sense of duty to family and country, rather than writing novels… all the more reason to be glad for the reissue.
That being said, I am almost glad that she did not live to see the film, though it is beneficial in promoting the book and, on its own, is a very fun film. So, that sounds confusing. Let me clarify: The film Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day, directed by Bharat Nalluri and starring Oscar-winner Frances McDormand (Fargo) as Miss Pettigrew, is based on the novel, but not true to it. It is really its own entity, and for most viewers who don’t read the book, it will delight as a charming story about living life and finding love. There are great Thirties costumes, music {Amy Adams co-stars as Delysia LaFosse, Miss P’s new BFF and a nightclub singer} and yes, a happy, romantic ending.
However (gripe, gripe), they changed the story; even though the book was practically begging to be a screenplay, apparently it had to be adjusted for modern audiences. So, Dy saw the film first, loved it and ran to get the book. I read it first and probably ruined my own viewing pleasure, because then I found myself ripping it apart at the loose plot-seams. Maybe I would have felt differently if I had watched the film first, but I am a firm believer that the book is always better and I cannot help my critical self. It just drives me nuts when the perfectly good plot gets realigned so much. And it just seems to happen more often than not. Maybe next time I should wait to read the book after seeing a film.
I don’t want to spoil the story, but I will state that the most annoying change, to me, is that of the character of Miss Edythe DuBarry. In the book, she is a friend and an ally. She is a delightfully crass, independent businesswoman. She rocks. In the film, she is manipulative, kind of tacky, and well, a bitch. I love the actress who plays her {Shirley Henderson, who is awesome in everything, but will always be Moaning Myrtle to me}, and she does a fine job presenting the role written for her, but I cannot help but wonder if she read the book and noticed the discrepancy too, because she doesn’t look too happy about it. The other thing I kept noticing while watching the film was that the screenplay puts a lot more emphasis on the looming war with Germany than Ms. Watson did at all. Of course, she was writing while events were unfolding and the references do help set the time and setting better, but still, I think Hollywood and associates have an obsession with war and like to add it in as a theme even where it does not need to be. The story of a woman discovering herself in a tumultuous era and breaking out of a mundane shell of propriety and boredom really is a good enough story without war and pain. At least to me it is.
FYI: The Carnival also comes with a meme, which I think I answered above
…and I pass on to you below… so the debate is on-TAG!
The Carnival Meme
To help spread the word about this edition of the carnival, answer the following question on your own blog: Do you prefer to read the book first or see the movie first?
Upcoming Editions of the Carnival
Edition 24 hosted by: Tracy at Book Room Reviews
Deadline for submission: February 27, 2009
Theme: Young Adult Literature
To submit a post, email: bookroomreviews at hotmail dot comEdition 25 hosted by: Jennifer at Quiverfull Family
Deadline for submission: March 13, 2009
Theme: Parenting (fiction or non-fiction)
To submit a post, email: jennifer at quiverfullfamily dot comEdition 26 hosted by: 1MoreChapter
Deadline for submission: March 27, 2009
Theme: Book Awards
To submit a post, email: 3m.michelle at gmail dot com
BTW: I am also posting this on the companion Lit Flick challenge at Bitchin Film Reviews, the blog run by Jessica’s bro, Blake. The emphasis there is more on film than lit, and he has tons more movie reviews and info for film buffs. And I will have 2 more posts soon! They are already written in my head



http://janflora.wordpress.com/files/2007/11/120_240_vertical.jpg


6 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 20, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Blake
The precarious relationship between books and their adaptations will always hinder the enjoyment of at least one of the two mediums. But, as you said, since I haven’t read this book, I’ll probably enjoy the movie! I’m going to check this one out.
February 20, 2009 at 7:30 pm
janflora
i think you are right, they have their own qualities that can clash. We can appreciate both forms independently, but i still get excited when a good book is being made, and sometimes I find myself thinking…”this would be a great film” while reading. One of the lists on the Carnival was “13 Book adaptations that don’t suck”…that’s an interesting list
Hope you enjoy the film!
February 24, 2009 at 8:44 am
Jessica
I’m so glad I’m a procrastinator too, so you could be included in the Carnival!
I’ve heard good things about both this book and the movie version. I prefer to read the book first, so I think I’ll hold off on seeing the movie for a while.
March 1, 2009 at 11:49 pm
dyricci
Hi Jan! Thanks for taking up my idea!
I know what you mean about books made into films…the book is almost always better, especially if you read the book first. It’s very difficult to live up to everyone’s expectations when creating the film. One can’t be inside all heads at once and the characters as put into film cannot be all things to all imaginations. Hence, the film will inevitably be the vision/perspective of mostly one or two persons…namely the director and screenwriter. Well, that is if you’re lucky and it doesn’t get muddled up by too many other cooks in the kitchen (often the producers and/or the studio want more say here and/or there and then it can really get of kilter).
I think viewing the film before reading the book allowed me to view one medium without preconceived expectations. The book, read afterwards, is definately vibrant enough to stand on its own and, though there are differences as there always are, I didn’t feel the contrast as greatly as you. I also actually liked the film’s use of the impending war as a muted backdrop to the glitz of the society forefront. I think it provided additional depth to the story’s setting, as well as brought attention to the disparity of age between Delysia and her social scene and that of Miss P.
Of course, I really am, in theory, a fan of reading the book first and then seeing the film. However, that often puts me at odds with myself as I would like, as with Miss P, to see the film without expectations in place.
Then, there are films I am afraid to see for fear that they will ruin it in the making. I still have not seen Blindness yet, having read the book when it came out in the translated english version in 1997 and I was blown away by the genius of it. As excited as I was when I saw that they were making it into a film, with Meirelles directing even, my excitment becamed cooled by my anxiety that it would be ruined. I have refused to even read reviews of the film or listen to anyone that has seen it…because I will see it…eventually…and soon…I think.
So, here I sit…with that dilemma…still…
March 4, 2009 at 2:16 pm
gypsyscarlett
Hi Janflora,
This was interesting. The book title sounds a bit familiar to me, but not its author. That is really great of Persephone Publishing to re-issue “forgotten” books. I’m sure there are tons of treasures out there.
March 5, 2009 at 9:38 am
janflora
Thank you again Jess, i look forward to doing it again, or another challenge maybe?
] that the director is considered the “auteur” of a film , rather than the screenwriter. IF and ‘when’ my hit novel is made into a film [haha], i hope I get to work on the screenplay too!…I am testing the theory now having viewed “Running with Scissors” before reading!
I enjoyed your blog… I am planning on checking out some more of the reissues from Persephone, so I will do my best to share. I love finding good book treasures!
Agreed, Dy, and I always thought that it was ironic [or something
Thanks for visiting gypsyscarlett